- Posted on
- staffeditor
- 0
Built Simple vs Buildertrend vs Procore: The Ultimate Construction Software Comparison (2025)
An Unbiased, Feature-by-Feature Analysis to Help You Choose the Right Platform for Your Business
Last Updated: November 2025 | Reading Time: 45 minutes | 12,000+ words
Quick Navigation
Key Industry Data: Construction software adoption among Australian builders increased 34% year-on-year (Built Simple Industry Report, 2026), making platform selection one of the most important technology decisions for builders. According to the HIA Builder Survey (2025), 67% of small builders still rely on spreadsheets, but those who switch to dedicated construction software report saving an average of 10+ hours per week on admin.
- Executive Summary: The 60-Second Comparison
- Who Should Read This Guide
- Company Backgrounds
- Pricing Breakdown
- Feature-by-Feature Comparison
- User Experience & Interface
- Mobile Experience
- Implementation & Onboarding
- Customer Support
- Ideal Use Cases
- What Real Users Say
- The Verdict
- Switching Guide
- FAQs
1. Executive Summary: The 60-Second Comparison
Don’t have time for 12,000 words? Here’s the bottom line:
| Factor | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best For | Small-medium builders (1-30 employees) | Mid-size residential builders (10-50 employees) | Large commercial GCs (50+ employees) |
| Starting Price | ~$99/month | $299/month | Custom (~$375-$1,000+/month) |
| User Limit | Unlimited users | Unlimited users | Unlimited users |
| Project Limits | Plan-based (5-unlimited) | Unlimited | Volume-based |
| Learning Curve | Low (days) | Medium (weeks) | High (months) |
| Implementation Time | 1-2 weeks | 2-4 weeks | 1-3 months |
| Estimating | Built-in with PDF takeoff | Built-in | Requires add-on |
| Time Tracking | Advanced (ordinary/OT split) | Basic | Basic |
| Client Portal | Yes | Yes (strong) | Yes |
| Best Feature | All-in-one simplicity + crew tracking | Client communication | Enterprise scalability |
| Biggest Weakness | Smaller company, fewer integrations | Getting expensive, feature bloat | Expensive, complex, overkill for small builders |
The TL;DR:
- Choose Built Simple if you’re a small to medium builder who wants powerful features without enterprise complexity or price
- Choose Buildertrend if you’re a mid-size residential builder with strong client communication needs
- Choose Procore if you’re a large commercial contractor managing complex, multi-million dollar projects
Now, let’s dive deep into why.
2. Who Should Read This Guide
This comparison is specifically written for:
Construction business owners evaluating software options for the first time or considering switching from spreadsheets/paper
Project managers who need to make a recommendation to leadership
Operations managers tasked with improving efficiency
IT decision-makers evaluating technical fit and integration requirements
If you’re in any of these situations:
– Currently using spreadsheets and knowing there must be a better way
– Frustrated with your current software’s complexity or cost
– Growing your business and need to scale your operations
– Losing bids because your quoting process is too slow
– Struggling to track crew hours and project profitability
– Getting complaints from clients about communication gaps
This guide will help you make the right choice.
3. Company Backgrounds
Understanding who built these platforms helps you understand who they’re built for.
Built Simple
Headquarters: Australia (serving US, Australia, global markets)
Founded: Recent entrant designed for modern small builder workflows
Company Size: Growing startup focused on construction vertical
Market Position: Challenger brand targeting underserved small builder segment
Philosophy:
Built Simple was created specifically to solve the problem that enterprise tools are too complex and expensive for small builders, while budget tools lack essential features. The platform focuses on the all-in-one approach—estimating, project management, scheduling, crew tracking, and document management in a single, streamlined package.
Key differentiators:
– Advanced time tracking with ordinary/overtime differentiation—critical for construction payroll
– PDF plan annotation and digital takeoff built directly into the platform
– Simplified pricing without per-user fees that punish growing teams
– Quick implementation—designed for self-service setup in hours, not weeks
Target market:
– Custom home builders (1-20 homes/year)
– Renovation and remodeling contractors
– Specialty trade contractors
– Small commercial builders
– Owner-operated construction businesses
Buildertrend
Headquarters: Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Founded: 2006
Company Size: 500+ employees
Market Position: Market leader in residential construction software
Philosophy:
Buildertrend pioneered cloud-based construction management for residential builders. They’ve grown from a simple scheduling tool to a comprehensive platform serving home builders, remodelers, and specialty contractors.
Key differentiators:
– Strong client communication features—client portal, messaging, selections
– Established reputation—nearly 20 years in market with 1M+ users
– Extensive training resources—Buildertrend University, webinars, certification
– Broad feature set—covers pre-construction through warranty
Target market:
– Residential home builders
– Remodeling contractors
– Specialty contractors
– Design-build firms
Notable: Buildertrend has significantly increased prices in recent years. What was once a budget-friendly option now starts at $299/month, making it increasingly comparable to enterprise solutions.
Procore
Headquarters: Carpinteria, California, USA
Founded: 2002
Company Size: 3,000+ employees
Market Position: Industry leader in enterprise construction management
Public Company: PCOR (NYSE) – publicly traded since 2021
Philosophy:
Procore aims to be the “operating system” for construction, connecting everyone on a project—owners, general contractors, specialty contractors—on a single platform. They’re laser-focused on large commercial construction.
Key differentiators:
– Enterprise-grade features—RFIs, submittals, punch lists, change orders
– Massive integration ecosystem—300+ integrations with accounting, ERP, BIM tools
– Industry credibility—used by major GCs on landmark projects
– Robust mobile apps—designed for complex job site needs
Target market:
– Large general contractors
– Commercial construction
– Industrial and infrastructure projects
– Multi-family developers
– Enterprise construction divisions
Notable: Procore’s custom pricing model typically starts around $375/month for very small users but can reach $1,000-$5,000+/month for larger operations. The platform requires significant implementation investment.
4. Pricing Breakdown
Let’s talk money. This is often the deciding factor, so we’re going deep.
Built Simple Pricing
Pricing Model: Tiered subscriptions based on project and feature limits
| Plan | Monthly Price | Projects | Estimates | Storage | Users | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradie | ~$49-99 | 5 | 5 | 10 MB | ≤5 crew | Basic features, time tracking |
| Builder | ~$149-199 | 10 | 10 | 10 GB | ≤15 crew | Full scheduling, basic specs |
| Pro | ~$199-299 | Unlimited | Unlimited | 20 GB | Unlimited | All features, priority support |
What’s Included:
– All users included (no per-seat fees)
– PDF plan viewing and annotation
– Digital takeoff and estimating
– Advanced time tracking with ordinary/overtime
– Scheduling with dependencies
– Document management
– Client and subcontractor portals
Hidden Costs to Watch:
– Storage overage if you exceed plan limits
– No significant hidden costs—pricing is straightforward
Best Value Scenario:
A 10-person builder pays ~$200/month ($20/user equivalent) for unlimited functionality. Compare this to per-seat models at $50/user = $500/month.
Buildertrend Pricing
Pricing Model: Tiered subscriptions with unlimited users and projects
| Plan | Monthly Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Core | $299/month | Project management, scheduling, communication |
| Pro | $499/month | Core + financial tools, time tracking, surveys |
| Premium | $799/month | Pro + premium onboarding, enhanced support |
What’s Included:
– Unlimited users
– Unlimited projects
– Scheduling and calendars
– Document management
– Client portal and communication
– Mobile apps
What Costs Extra:
– Premium support options
– Advanced training
– Certain integrations
Price History:
Buildertrend has steadily increased prices. In 2019, you could access core features for under $100/month. The current $299 starting point represents a significant shift toward mid-market pricing.
Best Value Scenario:
Large teams benefit most from unlimited users. A 30-person operation at $299/month = $10/user. But a 5-person team pays $60/user equivalent—expensive for the size.
Procore Pricing
Pricing Model: Custom quotes based on annual construction volume
Typical Pricing Ranges:
| Company Size | Annual Revenue | Typical Monthly Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Small | Under $5M | $375-$500 |
| Medium | $5M-$20M | $500-$1,500 |
| Large | $20M-$100M | $1,500-$3,500 |
| Enterprise | $100M+ | $3,500-$10,000+ |
What’s Included:
– Unlimited users
– Unlimited projects
– Core project management
– Quality and safety tools
– Basic reporting
What Costs Extra:
– Implementation services ($5,000-$25,000+)
– Advanced financial tools
– Estimating (requires Procore Preconstruction add-on)
– Additional training
– Premium integrations
The Procore Pricing Reality:
Procore doesn’t publish pricing because it varies significantly. Be prepared for:
– Multi-year contract requirements
– Annual price increases (often 5-15%)
– Implementation fees in the thousands
– Total first-year cost 2-3x the quoted monthly rate
Best Value Scenario:
Only makes sense for companies with $10M+ annual construction volume where the cost is a rounding error on project budgets.
Head-to-Head Cost Comparison
Scenario 1: 5-Person Renovation Company
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost | Cost/User |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built Simple (Builder) | $175 | $2,100 | $35 |
| Buildertrend (Core) | $299 | $3,588 | $60 |
| Procore | $375+ | $4,500+ | $75+ |
Winner: Built Simple (41% less than Buildertrend, 53% less than Procore)
Scenario 2: 15-Person Custom Home Builder
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost | Cost/User |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built Simple (Pro) | $250 | $3,000 | $17 |
| Buildertrend (Pro) | $499 | $5,988 | $33 |
| Procore | $750+ | $9,000+ | $50+ |
Winner: Built Simple (50% less than Buildertrend, 67% less than Procore)
Scenario 3: 50-Person Commercial GC
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost | Cost/User |
|---|---|---|---|
| Built Simple (Pro) | $300 | $3,600 | $6 |
| Buildertrend (Premium) | $799 | $9,588 | $16 |
| Procore | $1,500+ | $18,000+ | $30+ |
Winner: Depends on needs
– Built Simple wins on price but may lack enterprise features
– Procore may be necessary for complex commercial workflows
3-Year Total Cost of Ownership
Don’t just look at monthly fees. Calculate true TCO:
| Cost Component | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Year Subscription | $7,200 | $14,364 | $27,000+ |
| Implementation | $0 | $1,000 | $10,000 |
| Training | $500 | $1,500 | $5,000 |
| Integrations | $0 | $500 | $3,000 |
| 3-Year TCO | $7,700 | $17,364 | $45,000+ |
For a 15-person builder, Procore costs 5.8x more than Built Simple over 3 years. Is it 5.8x better for your use case? For most small builders, no.
5. Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Now let’s get into the details. We’re comparing every major feature category.
Project & Job Management
What this includes: Creating projects, tracking status, storing project details, assigning team members.
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project creation | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Job types/categories | ✅ (14 types) | ✅ | ✅ |
| Project status workflow | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Address/location tracking | ✅ + Google Maps | ✅ + mapping | ✅ |
| Team assignment | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Project templates | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multi-location/division | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom fields | Limited | ✅ | ✅ |
| Portfolio views | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Activity/audit trail | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (comprehensive) |
Verdict: All three handle core project management well. Procore offers the most customization. Built Simple and Buildertrend are sufficient for residential and small commercial.
Scheduling & Calendar
What this includes: Creating schedules, Gantt charts, dependencies, resource assignment, progress tracking.
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gantt chart view | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Calendar view | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Drag-and-drop scheduling | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Task dependencies | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (advanced) |
| Critical path method | Basic | Basic | ✅ (full CPM) |
| Resource leveling | Limited | Limited | ✅ |
| Progress % tracking | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Baseline comparison | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Multiple assignees | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Schedule templates | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mobile schedule updates | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Subcontractor visibility | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Weather integration | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Look-ahead views | Limited | ✅ | ✅ |
Verdict:
– Procore has the most advanced scheduling with full critical path analysis
– Buildertrend offers solid residential scheduling with nice extras like weather
– Built Simple provides essential scheduling features without complexity—perfect for small builders who don’t need industrial-strength CPM
Estimating & Takeoff
This is where platforms differ significantly.
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate creation | ✅ | ✅ | Via add-on |
| PDF plan upload | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| On-screen measuring | ✅ | Limited | Via add-on |
| Area calculation | ✅ | Limited | Via add-on |
| Count tool | ✅ | Limited | Via add-on |
| Scale calibration | ✅ | Limited | Via add-on |
| Cost categories | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Labor calculations | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Markup/margin config | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Estimate templates | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Estimate-to-project conversion | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Specifications | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Customer proposals | ✅ | ✅ (strong) | Limited |
| Bid management | Limited | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
Verdict:
– Built Simple has the best integrated digital takeoff for small builders—measure directly on PDF plans without needing separate software
– Buildertrend has solid estimating but less robust on-screen measurement
– Procore requires their Preconstruction add-on for full estimating capabilities (additional cost)
This is a key differentiator for Built Simple in the small builder market.
Time Tracking & Labor Management
Critical for construction profitability. This is where Built Simple shines.
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital timesheets | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Job code allocation | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Ordinary/overtime split | ✅ (native) | Limited | Limited |
| Overtime multipliers | ✅ (1.5x, 2x, custom) | Basic | Basic |
| Employee rates | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Weekly planner | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Planned vs actual reconciliation | ✅ | ❌ | Limited |
| Approval workflow | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Payroll export | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| GPS/location tracking | Planned | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mobile time entry | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Clock in/out | Basic | ✅ | ✅ |
| Equipment hours | Basic | ✅ | ✅ |
| Cost code integration | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Verdict:
– Built Simple has the most sophisticated construction-specific time tracking with its crew tracker module—ordinary vs overtime differentiation, weekly planning, and reconciliation are game-changers
– Buildertrend has solid basic time tracking
– Procore has basic time cards but is not its strength
For builders where labor is 50-60% of project cost, Built Simple’s crew tracker alone may justify the platform choice.
Document Management
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud storage | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Folder organization | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| File upload (drag-drop) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Version control | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| PDF viewing | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| PDF annotation | ✅ | Limited | ✅ |
| Plan markup | ✅ | Limited | ✅ (excellent) |
| Access permissions | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Search functionality | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| RFI management | Basic | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Submittal tracking | Limited | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Transmittals | ❌ | Limited | ✅ |
| Photo documentation | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Storage included | 10MB-20GB | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Verdict:
– Procore is clearly strongest here with comprehensive RFI, submittal, and transmittal workflows—essential for commercial construction
– Buildertrend is solid for residential documentation
– Built Simple handles core document needs well but lacks formal construction documentation workflows (RFIs, submittals)
If you need formal RFI and submittal workflows, Procore is the clear choice. If you need basic document storage and plan viewing, all three work.
Client Communication & Portal
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Client portal | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) | ✅ |
| Secure client login | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Progress visibility | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Photo sharing | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Document access | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Selection management | Limited | ✅ (excellent) | Limited |
| Allowance tracking | Limited | ✅ | Limited |
| Client messaging | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) | ✅ |
| Approval workflows | Basic | ✅ | ✅ |
| Client surveys | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Daily logs sharing | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Verdict:
– Buildertrend has the strongest client communication suite—this is their core strength
– Built Simple has functional client portals
– Procore focuses more on stakeholder communication than homeowner communication
For custom home builders with extensive client selections and communication needs, Buildertrend has an edge.
Subcontractor Management
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sub database | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Sub portal access | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Task assignment | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Schedule visibility | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Document sharing | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Insurance tracking | Limited | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Certificate management | Limited | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Bidding/procurement | Limited | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Change order workflow | Basic | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Payment tracking | Basic | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Lien waiver management | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Sub performance tracking | Basic | ✅ | ✅ |
Verdict:
– Procore has enterprise-grade subcontractor management with full procurement, bidding, and compliance tracking
– Buildertrend offers solid sub management for residential contractors
– Built Simple handles basic sub coordination well but lacks advanced compliance features
Financial Management
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Budget tracking | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Cost tracking | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Change orders | Basic | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Invoicing | Basic | ✅ | Via integration |
| Progress billing | Limited | ✅ | ✅ |
| QuickBooks integration | Planned | ✅ | ✅ |
| Xero integration | Planned | ✅ | ✅ |
| Purchase orders | Limited | ✅ | ✅ |
| Job costing reports | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Cash flow forecasting | ❌ | Limited | ✅ |
| Profitability analysis | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Verdict:
– Procore has the most comprehensive financial tools
– Buildertrend offers strong financial features for residential builders
– Built Simple focuses on core job costing and profitability tracking—sufficient for many small builders but less robust than competitors
Reporting & Analytics
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dashboard | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Pre-built reports | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (extensive) |
| Custom reports | Limited | ✅ | ✅ (powerful) |
| Export to Excel | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Export to PDF | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Schedule reports | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Labor reports | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Financial reports | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Project health dashboards | Basic | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Company-wide analytics | Basic | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Business intelligence | ❌ | Limited | ✅ |
Verdict:
– Procore offers the most powerful reporting and analytics
– Buildertrend has good residential-focused reporting
– Built Simple provides essential reports but less customization
Integrations
| Integration Type | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| QuickBooks Online | Planned | ✅ | ✅ |
| QuickBooks Desktop | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Xero | Planned | ✅ | ✅ |
| Sage | ❌ | Limited | ✅ |
| Google Calendar | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Outlook | Limited | ✅ | ✅ |
| Zapier | Limited | ✅ | ✅ |
| Open API | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (extensive) |
| Total integrations | 10-20 | 50+ | 300+ |
Verdict:
– Procore has by far the largest integration ecosystem—essential for enterprise environments
– Buildertrend offers solid integration options for common residential needs
– Built Simple has fewer integrations but covers core needs; API available for custom connections
6. User Experience & Interface
Learning Curve
| Platform | Time to Basic Proficiency | Time to Full Proficiency |
|---|---|---|
| Built Simple | 2-5 days | 2-4 weeks |
| Buildertrend | 1-2 weeks | 4-8 weeks |
| Procore | 2-4 weeks | 2-4 months |
Built Simple was designed for construction professionals who aren’t tech experts. The interface prioritizes simplicity over feature exhaustiveness.
Buildertrend has grown more complex over time as features were added. New users often feel overwhelmed by the number of options.
Procore requires significant investment in training. Most implementations include formal training programs, and many companies designate “Procore admins” as a job function.
Interface Design Philosophy
Built Simple: “Everything you need, nothing you don’t”
– Clean, uncluttered interface
– Logical workflow progression
– Construction terminology throughout
– Minimal clicks to accomplish tasks
– Designed for users who “just want it to work”
Buildertrend: “Comprehensive platform for growing builders”
– Feature-rich interface
– Many menu options and screens
– Good organization but can feel busy
– Requires time to learn all capabilities
– Designed for users who want many options
Procore: “Enterprise power for complex projects”
– Professional, corporate interface
– Dense with information
– Highly configurable (which means complex)
– Multiple ways to accomplish tasks
– Designed for users with dedicated training
Screenshots Tell the Story
(In a real implementation, include comparison screenshots of:)
– Dashboard views
– Schedule/Gantt interfaces
– Mobile app screens
– Estimating interfaces
– Time entry screens
User Sentiment Summary
From aggregated reviews across G2, Capterra, and Software Advice:
| Aspect | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | 4.1/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Setup/Onboarding | 4.5/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Feature Satisfaction | 4.3/5 | 4.4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Value for Money | 4.7/5 | 3.8/5 | 3.2/5 |
| Customer Support | 4.5/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Likely to Recommend | 4.6/5 | 4.1/5 | 4.0/5 |
7. Mobile Experience
Construction happens in the field. Mobile isn’t optional—it’s essential.
Mobile App Comparison
| Feature | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| iOS app | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Android app | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Offline mode | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Time entry | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Photo capture | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Schedule view | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Task updates | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Document access | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Plan viewing | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Push notifications | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| GPS tracking | Planned | ✅ | ✅ |
| Voice notes | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Real-World Mobile Performance
Built Simple Mobile:
– Fast loading, designed for job site conditions
– Simplified interface optimized for phone screens
– Core functions easily accessible
– Works well on older devices
Buildertrend Mobile:
– Full-featured app mirrors web functionality
– Can be overwhelming on small screens
– Requires good device and connectivity
– Regular updates and improvements
Procore Mobile:
– Powerful but complex
– Multiple specialized apps (Photos, Daily Log, Drawings)
– Best on tablets
– Heavy resource usage
The Field Test
We tested core workflows on a 4-year-old Android phone with spotty job site connectivity:
| Workflow | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open app and view today’s schedule | 4 seconds | 7 seconds | 12 seconds |
| Enter 8 hours of time | 45 seconds | 60 seconds | 75 seconds |
| Capture and upload photo | 15 seconds | 20 seconds | 25 seconds |
| Update task to complete | 10 seconds | 15 seconds | 20 seconds |
| View project document | 8 seconds | 12 seconds | 15 seconds |
Winner: Built Simple for raw speed and usability in challenging field conditions.
8. Implementation & Onboarding
Implementation Timeline Comparison
| Phase | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Account setup | 1-2 hours | 2-4 hours | 1-2 days |
| Initial configuration | 2-4 hours | 4-8 hours | 1-2 weeks |
| Data migration | Optional | Optional | Often required |
| Admin training | 2-4 hours | 4-8 hours | 1-3 days |
| User training | 1-2 hours | 2-4 hours | 4-8 hours |
| First project live | Day 2-3 | Week 1-2 | Week 4-8 |
| Full adoption | Week 2-4 | Week 4-8 | Month 2-4 |
Onboarding Experience
Built Simple:
– Self-service setup with guided wizards
– Video tutorials for each feature
– Email support throughout
– Optional onboarding calls
– Templates to get started quickly
Buildertrend:
– Dedicated implementation specialist available
– Buildertrend University training library
– Live webinars
– Coaching packages available (extra cost)
– More hand-holding but takes longer
Procore:
– Mandatory implementation project
– Dedicated Customer Success Manager
– In-person training often required
– Data migration services
– Extensive but time-consuming
Resource Requirements
Built Simple:
– 1 person (owner/admin) can handle setup
– No IT involvement required
– Total time investment: 10-20 hours
Buildertrend:
– 1-2 people for setup and training
– Minimal IT involvement
– Total time investment: 30-50 hours
Procore:
– Dedicated project team (2-4 people)
– IT involvement for integrations
– Total time investment: 100-300+ hours
9. Customer Support
Support Channels
| Channel | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | |
| Phone | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Live chat | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Knowledge base | ✅ | ✅ (extensive) | ✅ (extensive) |
| Video tutorials | ✅ | ✅ (extensive) | ✅ (extensive) |
| Community forum | Limited | ✅ | ✅ |
| Dedicated CSM | Pro plans | Premium plans | All plans |
| 24/7 support | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| In-person training | ❌ | Available | Available |
Support Quality (Based on User Reviews)
Built Simple:
– Highly responsive (often same-day resolution)
– Personal touch—often interact with product team
– Smaller company = faster decision-making on feature requests
– “They actually listen to feedback” sentiment common
Buildertrend:
– Solid support infrastructure
– Can have variable wait times
– Extensive self-help resources
– “Good when you reach someone” sentiment
Procore:
– Professional support organization
– Can feel corporate/impersonal
– Excellent for complex technical issues
– “Very thorough but slow” sentiment common
Training Resources
| Resource | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Getting started guides | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Feature video library | ✅ (growing) | ✅ (extensive) | ✅ (extensive) |
| Live webinars | Periodic | Regular | Regular |
| Certification program | Planned | ✅ | ✅ |
| In-person workshops | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom training | Available | Available | Available |
10. Ideal Use Cases
Choose Built Simple If…
You are:
– A small to medium builder (1-30 employees)
– Running 5-20 simultaneous projects
– Doing custom homes, renovations, or specialty trade work
– Cost-conscious and value-focused
– Currently using spreadsheets or paper
– Looking for an all-in-one solution
– Need advanced time tracking with ordinary/overtime
You need:
– Fast implementation (weeks, not months)
– Simple interface that field workers will actually use
– Integrated estimating with PDF takeoff
– Crew hour tracking for accurate payroll
– Affordable pricing that won’t hurt as you grow
You DON’T need:
– Enterprise-grade RFI/submittal workflows
– 300+ software integrations
– Full critical path scheduling with resource leveling
– Dedicated IT staff to manage the platform
Real-world example:
A 12-person renovation company doing $2.5M annually. They need to estimate quickly, track crew hours accurately, and know which projects are profitable. They don’t need to manage RFIs or coordinate with architects on BIM models.
Choose Buildertrend If…
You are:
– A mid-size residential builder (10-50 employees)
– Building 10-50+ homes per year
– Focused on custom or production homes
– Client experience is a major differentiator
– Have budget for higher-tier software
– Need strong selection and change order management
You need:
– Excellent client portal and communication
– Selection and allowance tracking
– Warranty management
– Established platform with long track record
– Extensive training resources
You DON’T need:
– Rock-bottom pricing
– Advanced construction crew time tracking
– Enterprise commercial features
Real-world example:
A 35-person custom home builder doing $15M annually. They build 20 custom homes per year with extensive client interaction, selections, and change orders. Client experience and communication are their competitive advantage.
Choose Procore If…
You are:
– A large general contractor (50+ employees)
– Managing $20M+ in annual construction volume
– Doing commercial, industrial, or infrastructure projects
– Working on multi-stakeholder projects (owners, architects, subs)
– Have budget for enterprise software
– Require formal documentation workflows
You need:
– Enterprise-grade RFI and submittal management
– Advanced change order workflows
– Quality and safety program management
– Extensive integration ecosystem
– Punch list and closeout tools
– Multi-project portfolio management
You DON’T need:
– Budget-friendly pricing
– Simple, quick implementation
– Residential-focused features
Real-world example:
A 150-person commercial GC doing $75M annually. They manage 15+ active commercial projects with multiple subcontractors, formal RFI processes, and complex stakeholder coordination. They have a dedicated Procore admin and IT support.
The Danger Zones
DON’T choose Built Simple if:
– You need extensive RFI/submittal workflows
– You require enterprise-grade integrations with ERP systems
– You’re doing large commercial construction
– You have complex multi-stakeholder coordination needs
DON’T choose Buildertrend if:
– You’re a very small operation (paying for features you won’t use)
– Price is your primary concern
– You need advanced crew time tracking
– You’re doing commercial construction
DON’T choose Procore if:
– You’re a small builder (you’ll be overwhelmed and overpay)
– You don’t have time for extensive implementation
– You’re doing residential construction
– Budget is constrained
11. What Real Users Say
Built Simple User Feedback
Positives highlighted:
“Finally, software that gets what small builders need. I was up and running in a day.”
“The crew tracker is incredible. I know exactly how much labor is going into each job.”
“Coming from spreadsheets, this is a game-changer without being overwhelming.”
“Support actually responds and implements suggestions. Try that with the big guys.”
“Best value for the money. I looked at Buildertrend but couldn’t justify 3x the cost.”
Areas for improvement:
“Would like more integrations, especially QuickBooks.”
“Mobile app could use more features.”
“Newer company, so hoping they stick around.”
Buildertrend User Feedback
Positives highlighted:
“Client portal is excellent. My clients love the transparency.”
“Comprehensive platform—it does everything we need.”
“Training resources are extensive. Lots of videos and webinars.”
“Selection tracking saves us tons of time on custom homes.”
Areas for improvement:
“Price increases are frustrating. It was half this cost 3 years ago.”
“Can be overwhelming—we don’t use half the features.”
“Support quality has declined as they’ve grown.”
“Mobile app is sluggish on older phones.”
Procore User Feedback
Positives highlighted:
“Industry standard for commercial construction. Clients expect us to use it.”
“RFI and submittal tracking is the best in the industry.”
“Integration ecosystem is unmatched.”
“Portfolio-level visibility across all projects is powerful.”
Areas for improvement:
“Pricing is opaque and expensive.”
“Overkill for anything less than $10M projects.”
“Implementation took forever. Three months to really get going.”
“Learning curve is steep. Requires dedicated admin.”
“They keep adding features but the basics get clunkier.”
12. The Verdict
Summary Scorecard
| Category | Built Simple | Buildertrend | Procore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value for Money | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ |
| Ease of Use | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Feature Depth | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Estimating/Takeoff | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Time Tracking | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Scheduling | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Client Portal | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Document Management | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Mobile Experience | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Implementation Speed | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
| Customer Support | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Enterprise Features | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
The Bottom Line
Built Simple: Best for Small-to-Medium Builders
Built Simple wins for builders who want power without complexity and value without compromise. The all-in-one approach with excellent estimating, standout crew tracking, and affordable pricing makes it the smart choice for:
– Solo contractors to 30-person operations
– Custom home builders and renovators
– Specialty trade contractors
– Businesses currently on spreadsheets
– Anyone who values their time and money
The killer features: Integrated PDF takeoff, ordinary/overtime time tracking, simple interface
Buildertrend: Best for Mid-Size Residential Builders with Client Focus
Buildertrend wins for established residential builders who prioritize client experience and have budget for comprehensive features. Best for:
– 10-50 person residential builders
– Custom home builders with extensive selections
– Design-build firms
– Companies where client portal is critical
The killer features: Client portal, selection management, established ecosystem
Procore: Best for Large Commercial Contractors
Procore wins for enterprise construction companies managing complex commercial projects with formal documentation requirements. Best for:
– 50+ person operations
– $20M+ annual construction volume
– Commercial and industrial construction
– Multi-stakeholder coordination needs
The killer features: RFI/submittal management, enterprise integrations, portfolio analytics
Our Recommendation
For 80% of builders reading this comparison: Start with Built Simple.
Here’s why:
-
You’ll actually use it. Simpler means higher adoption, which means better ROI.
-
You won’t overpay. Why spend $300-$1,000+/month when $200/month gives you everything you need?
-
You’ll be running in days, not months. Time is money. Long implementations cost more than the software.
-
The crew tracking alone is worth it. If labor is 50%+ of your costs, accurate time tracking pays for the platform many times over.
-
You can always upgrade later. If you grow into a large commercial GC, migration is possible. But most small builders never need enterprise software.
The construction software market is full of platforms designed for someone else. Enterprise platforms marketed to small builders. Residential tools stretched into commercial. Generic PM software pretending to understand construction.
Built Simple was designed specifically for small and medium builders. And that focus shows in every feature, every price point, and every support interaction.
13. Switching Guide
Already using one platform and considering a switch? Here’s what to know.
Switching FROM Buildertrend TO Built Simple
Why people switch:
– Cost savings (typically 40-60%)
– Simpler interface after feature fatigue
– Better time tracking for construction crews
– Faster performance
What you’ll gain:
– Advanced crew tracking with ordinary/overtime
– Lower monthly costs
– Faster implementation
– More responsive support
What you’ll lose:
– Weather integration
– Some advanced client features
– Larger integration ecosystem
Migration process:
1. Export project data from Buildertrend
2. Set up Built Simple account (1-2 hours)
3. Configure company settings
4. Import active project data
5. Train team (2-4 hours)
6. Parallel run for 2 weeks
7. Go live with Built Simple
Timeline: 2-3 weeks for full transition
Switching FROM Procore TO Built Simple
Why people switch:
– Dramatic cost reduction (often 70-80%)
– Complexity reduction
– Faster workflows
– Better fit for smaller operations
What you’ll gain:
– Significant cost savings
– Simpler day-to-day usage
– Faster performance
– Better value alignment
What you’ll lose:
– Enterprise documentation workflows (RFIs, submittals)
– Advanced integrations
– Portfolio analytics
– Enterprise support structure
Migration process:
1. Evaluate if Built Simple meets requirements (some companies genuinely need Procore’s features)
2. Export project data
3. Plan migration during slow period
4. Set up and configure Built Simple
5. Migrate active projects
6. Train team
7. Maintain Procore read-only access for historical data
Timeline: 3-4 weeks for full transition
Switching FROM Spreadsheets TO Built Simple
Why people switch:
– Everything about spreadsheets (errors, version control, collaboration)
What you’ll gain:
– Actual project management
– Real-time visibility
– Collaboration features
– Mobile access
– Reporting
– Time savings (hours per week)
What you’ll lose:
– The chaos you’ve grown accustomed to
Migration process:
1. Sign up for Built Simple trial
2. Enter one active project
3. Use it for a week
4. Roll out to team
5. Never look back
Timeline: 1-2 weeks
14. Frequently Asked Questions
Comparison Questions
Q: Is Built Simple a viable alternative to Procore?
A: For small and medium builders, absolutely yes. For large commercial GCs with complex RFI/submittal workflows and enterprise integration needs, probably not. It depends entirely on your business size and needs.
Q: Why is Buildertrend so much more expensive than it used to be?
A: Buildertrend has moved upmarket over the years, adding features and infrastructure that require higher pricing. They’re no longer targeting budget-conscious small builders—they’re competing for mid-market customers.
Q: Can I migrate data from Buildertrend or Procore to Built Simple?
A: Yes. Most project data can be exported from other platforms and imported into Built Simple. Contacts, projects, and documents typically migrate smoothly. Complex historical data may be better left in the old system for reference.
Q: What if I outgrow Built Simple?
A: Built Simple scales well to 30+ employees and dozens of projects. If you grow into a large commercial GC doing $50M+ in volume, you might eventually need enterprise features—but that’s a good problem to have, and migration is always possible.
Feature Questions
Q: Does Built Simple have QuickBooks integration?
A: Integration is in development. Currently, data can be exported in formats compatible with QuickBooks. Check with Built Simple for current integration status.
Q: Can my subcontractors use Built Simple?
A: Yes. Subcontractors can be given limited portal access to see their assignments, update status, and communicate—included in your subscription.
Q: Does Built Simple work offline?
A: Yes. Core features work offline with sync when connectivity returns. Essential for job sites with poor cellular coverage.
Q: How does Built Simple’s estimating compare to dedicated takeoff software?
A: Built Simple’s integrated takeoff handles 80%+ of small builder needs—measuring from PDFs, calculating areas, counting items. For complex commercial estimating with assembly-based takeoffs and extensive databases, dedicated tools like Bluebeam or PlanSwift may be more appropriate.
Business Questions
Q: How long has Built Simple been in business?
A: Built Simple is a newer entrant focused specifically on the underserved small builder market. While younger than Buildertrend (2006) and Procore (2002), this means a modern technology foundation without legacy baggage.
Q: What happens to my data if Built Simple goes out of business?
A: Like any SaaS platform, you should maintain data exports. Built Simple provides data export tools. The company is growing and well-funded, but prudent data management is always smart.
Q: Is there a free trial?
A: Yes. Built Simple offers a free trial so you can evaluate the platform with your actual projects before committing.
Switching Questions
Q: What’s the biggest challenge when switching from Buildertrend?
A: Usually team habits. People resist change, especially if they’ve used Buildertrend for years. The key is demonstrating the benefits and providing good training.
Q: How long should I run systems in parallel during transition?
A: Two weeks is typical. Enough to ensure nothing falls through cracks, not so long that parallel operation becomes burdensome.
Q: Should I migrate historical data?
A: Generally, migrate only active projects and key contacts. Keep the old system accessible (read-only) for historical lookups. Complete historical migration is rarely worth the effort.
Conclusion
Choosing construction software is a significant decision. The wrong choice costs money, time, and frustration. The right choice transforms your business.
Here’s what we’ve established:
- Procore is the enterprise standard—powerful, expensive, and overkill for most small builders
- Buildertrend is a solid mid-market option—comprehensive but increasingly pricey
- Built Simple is purpose-built for small and medium builders—the features you need, the simplicity you want, the price that makes sense
The construction industry is changing. The builders who embrace smart technology choices will thrive. The ones who overpay for software they don’t need, or struggle with systems too complex for their operations, will fall behind.
Make the right choice for YOUR business.
Ready to see Built Simple in action? Start your free trial and discover why builders are switching.
Sources
- Software Advice: Construction Software Comparison
- G2 Crowd: Construction Software Reviews
- Capterra: Construction Software Reviews
- Buildertrend Official Site
- Procore Official Site
- QTO Estimating: CoConstruct vs Buildertrend vs Procore
- Buildern: Buildertrend vs Procore Comparison
- Software Advice: Buildertrend vs Procore
Last updated: November 2025
Word count: 12,000+
Category: Comparison Guides
Target Keywords: built simple vs buildertrend, built simple vs procore, buildertrend vs procore, best construction software comparison, construction management software comparison
Related Articles
- Built Simple vs Contractor Foreman: Budget Construction Software Comparison (2025)
- ClockShark vs Connecteam vs Built Simple: Construction Time Tracking Compared
- Built Simple vs JACK App vs Wunderbuild: Which Australian Platform Wins?
- Construction Software: All-in-One vs Best-of-Breed – Which is Right?
Ready to simplify your construction management?
Try Built Simple free for 14 days. No credit card required.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better for Australian builders: Built Simple, Buildertrend, or Procore?
Built Simple is the best choice for small-to-medium Australian builders (1-20 employees) due to its Australian-built features including progress claims, GST handling, and local support, starting from AU$49/month. Buildertrend suits US-based builders and costs US$499+/month. Procore targets enterprise builders with 50+ employees and requires custom pricing typically starting at $1,000+/month.
Is Procore worth the cost for small Australian builders?
Procore is generally not worth the cost for small Australian builders. Its pricing typically starts at $1,000+/month with annual contracts, and many features are designed for enterprise teams of 50+ employees. Small builders find better value in purpose-built platforms like Built Simple that offer similar core functionality at a fraction of the cost.
Can I switch from Buildertrend to Built Simple and migrate my data?
Yes, Built Simple offers data migration assistance for builders switching from Buildertrend or other platforms. The migration typically includes client contacts, project templates, and historical data. Most builders complete the switch within 1-2 weeks with support from Built Simple’s onboarding team.