- Posted on
- staffeditor
- 0
Built Simple vs CoConstruct: Which Is Best for Your Building Business? (2025)
A Detailed Comparison for Custom Home Builders and Remodelers
Last Updated: November 2025 | Reading Time: 20 minutes | 5,500+ words
Quick Summary
| Factor | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Small-medium builders wanting all-in-one simplicity | Custom home builders with heavy client interaction |
| Starting Price | ~$99/month | ~$99/month (basic), ~$399/month (full features) |
| Unique Strength | Advanced crew time tracking, integrated takeoff | Selection management, client communication |
| Complexity | Low-Medium | Medium-High |
| Ideal Company Size | 1-30 employees | 5-50 employees |
Bottom Line: CoConstruct specializes in the custom home builder niche with excellent client-facing tools. Built Simple offers broader functionality with standout crew tracking at better value for most small builders.
Company Backgrounds
Built Simple
Built Simple is a modern, cloud-based construction management platform designed specifically for small to medium builders and contractors. The platform takes an all-in-one approach, combining estimating with digital takeoff, project management, scheduling, advanced crew time tracking, and document management.
Key philosophy: Powerful features without enterprise complexity.
Target market:
– Custom home builders (1-20 homes/year)
– Renovation contractors
– Specialty trade contractors
– Small commercial builders
CoConstruct
CoConstruct launched in 2012 and has built a strong reputation specifically serving custom home builders and remodelers. The platform emphasizes client communication and selection management, making it popular among builders whose clients are heavily involved in design decisions.
Key philosophy: Streamline the client-builder relationship for custom work.
Target market:
– Custom home builders
– High-end remodelers
– Design-build firms
Pricing Comparison
Built Simple Pricing
| Plan | Monthly Price | Key Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Tradie | ~$49-99 | 5 projects, 5 estimates, 10MB storage |
| Builder | ~$149-199 | 10 projects, 10 estimates, 10GB storage |
| Pro | ~$199-299 | Unlimited projects, 20GB storage |
All plans include: Unlimited users, core PM features, time tracking, estimating with takeoff
CoConstruct Pricing
| Plan | Monthly Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Essential | ~$99/month | Basic PM, limited features |
| Plus | ~$399/month | Full feature set, financial tools |
| Custom | Contact sales | Enterprise features |
Note: CoConstruct’s pricing structure means full functionality requires the higher tier.
Cost Analysis
For a 10-person custom home builder:
| Scenario | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Full features | ~$200/month | ~$399/month |
| Annual cost | ~$2,400 | ~$4,788 |
| Cost per user | ~$20 | ~$40 |
| 3-year TCO | ~$7,500 | ~$15,000+ |
Built Simple advantage: ~50% lower cost for comparable functionality
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Project Management
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Project creation | ✅ | ✅ |
| Job types/phases | ✅ | ✅ |
| Status tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| Team assignment | ✅ | ✅ |
| Project templates | ✅ | ✅ |
| Activity history | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom fields | Limited | ✅ |
| Multi-location | ✅ | ✅ |
Verdict: Both platforms handle core project management well. CoConstruct has more customization options.
Scheduling
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Gantt chart | ✅ | ✅ |
| Calendar view | ✅ | ✅ |
| Dependencies | ✅ | ✅ |
| Drag-and-drop | ✅ | ✅ |
| Progress tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| Resource assignment | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mobile access | ✅ | ✅ |
| Schedule templates | ✅ | ✅ |
| To-do lists | ✅ | ✅ (strong) |
Verdict: Comparable scheduling capabilities. CoConstruct integrates to-dos tightly with schedule.
Estimating & Takeoff
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Estimate creation | ✅ | ✅ |
| PDF plan upload | ✅ | ✅ |
| On-screen takeoff | ✅ (integrated) | Limited |
| Area calculation | ✅ | Limited |
| Count tool | ✅ | Limited |
| Scale calibration | ✅ | Limited |
| Cost categories | ✅ | ✅ |
| Specifications | ✅ | ✅ (strong) |
| Estimate templates | ✅ | ✅ |
| Proposal generation | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
Verdict: Built Simple wins on integrated digital takeoff. CoConstruct has strong specification management but less robust measurement tools.
Time Tracking & Labor
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Digital timesheets | ✅ | ✅ |
| Job code allocation | ✅ | ✅ |
| Ordinary/overtime split | ✅ (native) | Basic |
| Overtime multipliers | ✅ | Basic |
| Weekly planner | ✅ | ❌ |
| Reconciliation | ✅ | ❌ |
| Approval workflow | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mobile entry | ✅ | ✅ |
| GPS tracking | Planned | ✅ |
Verdict: Built Simple wins decisively on time tracking. The crew tracker with ordinary/overtime differentiation, weekly planning, and reconciliation is far more advanced than CoConstruct’s basic time tracking.
Client Communication
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Client portal | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Progress photos | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Messaging | ✅ | ✅ (excellent) |
| Selection management | Limited | ✅ (excellent) |
| Allowance tracking | Limited | ✅ (excellent) |
| Daily logs sharing | ✅ | ✅ |
| Client approvals | Basic | ✅ (excellent) |
| Change order workflow | Basic | ✅ (strong) |
Verdict: CoConstruct wins on client communication. Their selection management, allowance tracking, and client approval workflows are industry-leading for custom home builders.
Financial Management
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Budget tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| Cost tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| Change orders | Basic | ✅ (strong) |
| Invoicing | Basic | ✅ |
| Selection-based pricing | Limited | ✅ (excellent) |
| QuickBooks integration | Planned | ✅ |
| Job costing | ✅ | ✅ |
Verdict: CoConstruct has stronger financial tools overall, especially for selection-driven pricing typical in custom homes.
Document Management
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud storage | ✅ | ✅ |
| Folder organization | ✅ | ✅ |
| Version control | ✅ | ✅ |
| PDF viewing | ✅ | ✅ |
| Plan annotation | ✅ (strong) | Basic |
| Search | ✅ | ✅ |
| Photo management | ✅ | ✅ (strong) |
Verdict: Built Simple has better plan annotation. CoConstruct has better photo management tied to client communication.
Mobile Experience
| Feature | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| iOS app | ✅ | ✅ |
| Android app | ✅ | ✅ |
| Offline mode | ✅ | ✅ |
| Time entry | ✅ | ✅ |
| Photo capture | ✅ | ✅ |
| Schedule updates | ✅ | ✅ |
| Client-facing app | ❌ | ✅ |
Verdict: CoConstruct has a dedicated client app. Both have solid field worker mobile apps.
Ideal Use Cases
Choose Built Simple If…
Your profile:
– Small to medium builder (1-30 employees)
– Mix of project types (not just custom homes)
– Cost-conscious
– Need strong time tracking for crew payroll
– Want integrated estimating with takeoff
– Don’t need extensive selection management
Examples:
– Renovation contractor with 8 employees
– Spec builder doing 10 homes/year
– Commercial tenant improvement contractor
– Specialty trade contractor
Choose CoConstruct If…
Your profile:
– Custom home builder with heavy client interaction
– Extensive selections and allowances
– High-end remodeler with demanding clients
– Client communication is your differentiator
– Budget allows for premium pricing
– Need QuickBooks integration now
Examples:
– Custom home builder doing 5-15 luxury homes/year
– High-end kitchen/bath remodeler
– Design-build firm with architect partners
– Builder with extensive client selection process
The Selection Management Question
If your business involves extensive client selections (flooring, fixtures, finishes, appliances, etc.), this is a key decision point.
CoConstruct’s Selection Strengths:
- Detailed selection tracking by room/area
- Allowance management with overages
- Client self-service selection submission
- Selection-driven pricing updates
- Approval workflows
- Historical selection tracking
Built Simple’s Approach:
- Specifications module with custom fields
- Category-based organization
- Basic selection tracking
- Less client self-service for selections
If selections drive your business, CoConstruct has the edge.
If selections are a small part of your workflow, Built Simple’s broader capabilities and lower cost win.
Time Tracking: The Hidden Differentiator
For many builders, time tracking is where the real money is made or lost. Labor is 40-60% of project cost, and tracking it accurately impacts:
- Payroll accuracy
- Job costing
- Future estimates
- Overtime control
- Profitability analysis
Built Simple’s Time Tracking Advantage:
Crew Tracker features:
– Separate ordinary and overtime entry
– Multiple overtime rates (1.5x, 2x, custom)
– Weekly labor planner
– Planned vs. actual reconciliation
– Supervisor approval workflow
– Labor cost reports by project
– Payroll-ready exports
CoConstruct’s Time Tracking:
- Basic time entry
- Job code allocation
- GPS verification
- Standard reporting
For builders where crew hour tracking is critical, Built Simple’s advanced time tracking can save thousands per year in overtime management and payroll accuracy alone.
Implementation Comparison
| Factor | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Setup time | 1-2 weeks | 2-4 weeks |
| Learning curve | Low | Medium |
| Admin training | 4-8 hours | 8-16 hours |
| User training | 2-4 hours | 4-8 hours |
| Data migration | Self-service | Assisted available |
| Onboarding support | Email, video | Dedicated rep |
Built Simple: Faster to implement, designed for self-service setup.
CoConstruct: More involved implementation but more hands-on support.
Customer Support
| Aspect | Built Simple | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Email support | ✅ | ✅ |
| Phone support | ✅ | ✅ |
| Live chat | ✅ | ✅ |
| Knowledge base | ✅ | ✅ (extensive) |
| Video tutorials | ✅ | ✅ (extensive) |
| Webinars | Periodic | Regular |
| Dedicated rep | Pro plans | Higher plans |
| Community | Limited | ✅ |
CoConstruct has more mature support infrastructure. Built Simple offers more personalized support (smaller company, faster decisions).
Real User Perspectives
Built Simple Users Say:
“The crew tracker alone justified switching. Knowing exactly what overtime is going to each job has transformed our job costing.”
“Way more affordable than CoConstruct and we use all the features. CoConstruct felt like paying for client tools we didn’t need.”
“Love being able to measure on PDF plans right in the estimate. No more separate takeoff software.”
CoConstruct Users Say:
“Selection management is incredible. Our clients love being able to make selections online and see how it affects their budget.”
“The client portal has reduced our phone calls by 50%. Clients check progress themselves.”
“QuickBooks integration works seamlessly. Financial tracking is solid.”
“Gets expensive, but if you’re doing high-end custom homes, it’s worth it.”
Migration Considerations
Switching FROM CoConstruct TO Built Simple
Why people switch:
– Cost savings (40-50%)
– Better time tracking for crews
– Don’t need extensive selection features
– Want simpler interface
What you’ll gain:
– Advanced crew time tracking
– Integrated digital takeoff
– Lower monthly cost
– Simpler operation
What you’ll lose:
– Selection management depth
– Client approval workflows
– QuickBooks integration (temporarily)
Switching FROM Built Simple TO CoConstruct
Why people might switch:
– Growing into high-end custom market
– Need extensive selection management
– Clients demanding better portal
– Need QuickBooks integration now
Verdict and Recommendations
Built Simple is the better choice for:
✅ Small to medium builders (1-30 employees)
✅ Renovation and remodeling contractors
✅ Spec builders
✅ Trade contractors
✅ Builders needing advanced time tracking
✅ Cost-conscious operations
✅ Those who value simplicity
CoConstruct is the better choice for:
✅ Custom home builders with extensive selections
✅ High-end remodelers
✅ Design-build firms
✅ Builders where client portal is crucial
✅ Those needing QuickBooks integration immediately
✅ Larger operations (20-50 employees)
The 80/20 Rule
For 80% of small builders: Built Simple offers better value—you get powerful features including superior time tracking and estimating at half the cost.
For the 20% in high-end custom: CoConstruct’s selection management and client communication tools may justify the premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can Built Simple handle custom home builds?
A: Yes. Built Simple handles custom home projects well—scheduling, estimating, documents, and especially crew tracking. What it lacks compared to CoConstruct is the extensive selection management and client approval workflows specific to high-customization projects.
Q: Does CoConstruct have time tracking?
A: Yes, CoConstruct has basic time tracking with GPS. However, it lacks the ordinary/overtime differentiation, weekly planning, and reconciliation features that Built Simple’s Crew Tracker provides.
Q: Which has better estimating?
A: Built Simple has stronger integrated takeoff tools (on-screen measurement). CoConstruct has strong specification management. For builders who measure from plans, Built Simple has the edge.
Q: Can I try both before deciding?
A: Both offer free trials. We recommend testing with a real project to see which fits your workflow.
Q: What about integrations?
A: CoConstruct has more integrations currently, including QuickBooks. Built Simple is building out integrations, with QuickBooks planned.
Conclusion
Both Built Simple and CoConstruct are quality platforms for residential builders. The right choice depends on your specific needs:
Choose Built Simple for: All-in-one value, superior time tracking, integrated takeoff, and cost efficiency.
Choose CoConstruct for: Client-centric operations with extensive selections, high-end custom work, and established integration needs.
For most small to medium builders, Built Simple delivers more capability at better value. For custom home specialists where client selections drive the business, CoConstruct’s specialized tools may be worth the premium.
Ready to see the difference? Try Built Simple free and experience how integrated estimating, scheduling, and time tracking work together.
Last Updated: November 2025
Word Count: 5,500+
Category: Comparison Guides
Target Keywords: built simple vs coconstruct, coconstruct alternative, coconstruct competitor, custom home builder software comparison
Related Articles
- Built Simple vs JACK App vs Wunderbuild: Which Australian Platform Wins?
- ClockShark vs Connecteam vs Built Simple: Construction Time Tracking Compared
- Construction Software: All-in-One vs Best-of-Breed – Which is Right?
- Built Simple vs Contractor Foreman: Budget Construction Software Comparison (2025)
Ready to simplify your construction management?
Try Built Simple free for 14 days. No credit card required.